Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37498060›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Comparative single-cell profiling reveals distinct cardiac resident macrophages essential for zebrafish heart regeneration.

Ke-Hsuan Wei, I-Ting Lin, Kaushik Chowdhury, Khai Lone Lim, Kuan-Ting Liu, Tai-Ming Ko, Yao-Ming Chang, Kai-Chien Yang, Shih-Lei Ben Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dynamic cardiac hyperplasia and hypertrophy in Burmese pythons.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Emerging Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy for Cardiac Vascular Imaging in Zebrafish.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Beyond Killing: The Overlooked Contribution of Neutrophils to Tissue Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Immune-mediated cardiac development and regeneration.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Multifaceted Role of Macrophages in Biology and Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ke-Hsuan WeiGraduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0005-8935-8432
I-Ting LinInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kaushik ChowdhuryInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Khai Lone LimInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kuan-Ting LiuDepartment of Biological Science & Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tai-Ming KoInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yao-Ming ChangInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kai-Chien YangInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shih-Lei Ben LaiGraduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1409-4701

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zebrafish exhibit a robust ability to regenerate their hearts following injury, and the immune system plays a key role in this process. We previously showed that delaying macrophage recruitment by clodronate liposome (-1d_CL, macrophage-delayed model) impairs neutrophil resolution and heart regeneration, even when the infiltrating macrophage number was restored within the first week post injury (Lai et al., 2017). It is thus intriguing to learn the regenerative macrophage property by comparing these late macrophages vs. control macrophages during cardiac repair. Here, we further investigate the mechanistic insights of heart regeneration by comparing the non-regenerative macrophage-delayed model with regenerative controls. Temporal RNAseq analyses revealed that -1d_CL treatment led to disrupted inflammatory resolution, reactive oxygen species homeostasis, and energy metabolism during cardiac repair. Comparative single-cell RNAseq profiling of inflammatory cells from regenerative vs. non-regenerative hearts further identified heterogeneous macrophages and neutrophils, showing alternative activation and cellular crosstalk leading to neutrophil retention and chronic inflammation. Among macrophages, two residential subpopulations (

Indexed as

HeartZebrafishAnimalsCicatrixInflammationMacrophagesMyocytes, Cardiaccomparative analysisdevelopmental biologyheart regenerationimmune responsemacrophagesmyocardial infarctionscRNAseqzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID37498060
PMCPMC10411971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.