ArticleANS. Advances in nursing science
Using a Constructivist-Oriented Modified Grounded Theory Approach in the Study of Intrafamily Trauma Communication Process in War-Affected Families: A Methodologic Example.
Article in ANS. Advances in nursing science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Process Model for Transitioning Care Responsibility to Adolescents and Young Adults with Biliary Atresia: A Secondary and Integrative Analysis.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Organ donation after death determination by circulatory criteria: family members' experiences with withdrawal of life-sustaining measures in Canadian intensive care units.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Article
- Low trust, high barriers: A qualitative study of perinatal care experiences in New York City during the early COVID-19 pandemic.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Grounded theory methodology is frequently applied in health research, yet studies contending with contextual constraints may require a more pragmatic approach, including potential methodologic divergence and modifications of method choice and application. Dissemination of a detailed documentation and justification of methodologic choices, and specific method modifications and/or innovations, are uncommon in extant literature; however, a more expansive approach to such reporting has the potential to enhance research practices, increase transparency, and contribute to the ongoing discourse around research approaches and rigor. Here, we articulate our methodologic decision-making and methods, including modifications, as applied to the qualitative strand of an explanatory mixed-methods study. The primary aim of this article is to contribute to the discourse and collective learning around methodology and method choices and modifications by presenting one approach to applying a constructivist-oriented, modified version of grounded theory analytic methods through a worked qualitative study example.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.