Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37498014›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2023

Modeling venous bias in resting state functional MRI metrics.

Julia Huck, Anna-Thekla Jäger, Uta Schneider, Sophia Grahl, Audrey P Fan, Christine Tardif, Arno Villringer, Pierre-Louis Bazin, Christopher J Steele, Claudine J Gauthier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Spurious correlations in surface-based functional brain imaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Imaging of the superficial white matter in health and disease.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Julia HuckDepartment of Physics, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5701-8506
Anna-Thekla JägerMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3381-8453
Uta SchneiderMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Sophia GrahlMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Audrey P FanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Christine TardifFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8356-6808
Arno VillringerMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2604-2404
Pierre-Louis BazinMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Christopher J SteeleMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Claudine J GauthierDepartment of Physics, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DEConcordia University · USMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CAUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Quantitative PET/MRI of brain oxygenation in cerebrovascular diseaseR00NS102884 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FAN, AUDREY PEIWEN · 2020 to 2022
$682k
NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS102884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting-state (rs) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is used to detect low-frequency fluctuations in the blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal across brain regions. Correlations between temporal BOLD signal fluctuations are commonly used to infer functional connectivity. However, because BOLD is based on the dilution of deoxyhemoglobin, it is sensitive to veins of all sizes, and its amplitude is biased by draining veins. These biases affect local BOLD signal location and amplitude, and may also influence BOLD-derived connectivity measures, but the magnitude of this venous bias and its relation to vein size and proximity is unknown. Here, veins were identified using high-resolution quantitative susceptibility maps and utilized in a biophysical model to investigate systematic venous biases on common local rsfMRI-derived measures. Specifically, we studied the impact of vein diameter and distance to veins on the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF), fractional ALFF (fALFF), Hurst exponent (HE), regional homogeneity (ReHo), and eigenvector centrality values in the grey matter. Values were higher across all distances in smaller veins, and decreased with increasing vein diameter. Additionally, rsfMRI values associated with larger veins decrease with increasing distance from the veins. ALFF and ReHo were the most biased by veins, while HE and fALFF exhibited the smallest bias. Across all metrics, the amplitude of the bias was limited in voxel-wise data, confirming that venous structure is not the dominant source of contrast in these rsfMRI metrics. Finally, the models presented can be used to correct this venous bias in rsfMRI metrics.

Indexed as

Brain MappingBrainCerebral CortexHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingbiasrsfMRIultra-high field MRIvasculature

Identifiers

PMID37498014
PMCPMC10472917
OpenAlexW4385295263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.