Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37497511›Full record

ReviewBiomedical optics express2023

Dynamic optical coherence tomography for cell analysis [Invited].

Salvatore Azzollini, Tual Monfort, Olivier Thouvenin, Kate Grieve

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical optics express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biomedical optics express · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Guide to dynamic OCT data analysis.Biomedical optics express · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Journal of biomedical optics · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Salvatore AzzolliniSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, F-75012 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5633-6597
Tual MonfortSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, F-75012 Paris, France.
Olivier ThouveninInstitut Langevin, ESPCI, PSL, 1 rue Jussieu 75005 Paris, France.
Kate GrieveSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, 17 rue Moreau, F-75012 Paris, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Langevin · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Label-free live optical imaging of dynamic cellular and subcellular features has been made possible in recent years thanks to the advances made in optical imaging techniques, including dynamic optical coherence tomography (D-OCT) methods. These techniques analyze the temporal fluctuations of an optical signal associated with the active movements of intracellular organelles to obtain an ensemble metric recapitulating the motility and metabolic state of cells. They hence enable visualization of cells within compact, static environments and evaluate their physiology. These emerging microscopies show promise, in particular for the three-dimensional evaluation of live tissue samples such as freshly excised biopsies and 3D cell cultures. In this review, we compare the various techniques used for dynamic OCT. We give an overview of the range of applications currently being explored and discuss the future outlook and opportunities for the field.

Identifiers

PMID37497511
PMCPMC10368035
OpenAlexW4379875867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.