ArticleBiomedical optics express2023
Defocus flicker of chromatic stimuli deactivates accommodation.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Measurement and Clinical Implications of the CA/C Ratio in Binocular Vision: A Literature Review.The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2026Review
- A metric-based image-formation model explains the improvement in subjective refraction using temporal defocus waves.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2025Article
- Contrast sensitivity is resilient to induced fast periodic defocus oscillations.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Introduction to Visual and Physiological Optics feature issue ofBiomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Assessment of an algorithm-based combination device for objective and subjective refraction: accuracy and efficiency across examiner experience levels.Journal of optometryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tunable lenses, optical elements able to change their optical power within milliseconds, constitute an emerging technology increasingly used in ophthalmic applications. In this study, 25 subjects looked through tunable lenses at a chromatic stimulus to evaluate the perceptual response of the human visual system to periodic changes in defocus of 0.25D of amplitude and 15 Hz of temporal frequency. These defocus changes produce flicker and chromatic distortions that change with the overall level of defocus. The task in this study was to minimize the flicker by varying the average optical power, and it was performed for different myopic and hyperopic starting points. Subjects also performed a blur-minimization task in a black-and-white stimulus of the same geometry. The flicker-minimization task is more repeatable than the blur-minimization task (standard deviations ±0.17D and ±0.49D). The time per repetition of the flicker-minimization task is only 38s. Cycloplegia severely affects the blur-minimization, but not the flicker-minimization task, confirming that defocus flicker deactivates the accommodative system. This discovery can be used to develop new methods for measuring the refractive error of the eye that does not require supervision and can potentially improve existing subjective methods in terms of accuracy, precision, and measurement time.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.