Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37497463›Full record

ArticleClinical optometry2023

Parent-Reported Visual Concerns in Children with Cerebral Visual Impairment Presenting to a Pediatric Neurology Clinic.

Rebecca Sumalini, Premalatha Errolla, Lokesh Lingappa, Miriam Conway, Ahalya Subramanian, PremNandhini Satgunam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical optometry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cerebral visual impairment (CVI) overlooked: A retrospective review of missed opportunities to diagnose CVI.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  4. Ohio Contrast Cards are reliable and robust to blur under cycloplegia in visually normal children.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca SumaliniBrien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4893-6361
Premalatha ErrollaDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Rainbow Children's Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Lokesh LingappaDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Rainbow Children's Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5643-2601
Miriam ConwayDivision of Optometry and Vision Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5016-0529
Ahalya SubramanianDivision of Optometry and Vision Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8104-5312
PremNandhini SatgunamBrien Holden Institute of Optometry and Vision Sciences, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8631-733X
City, University of London · GBRainbow Children's Hospital · INL V Prasad Eye Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Children with cerebral visual impairment (CVI) present with delayed developmental milestones. Pediatricians and pediatric neurologists are usually the first point of contact, and eye exam largely remains referral based. This study documented the visual concerns reported by parents of children with CVI visiting a pediatric neurology clinic. Additionally, we investigated the association between visual concerns, functional vision measures and visual functions. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was undertaken in children with CVI (chronological age range: 7 months-7 years). Visual concerns reported by the parents/caregivers were documented as open-ended statements. Additionally, a functional vision assessment was conducted using the CVI Range instrument with phase 1, 2 and 3 indicating low, moderate and high visual functioning, respectively. Grating acuity and contrast sensitivity were measured using Teller acuity cards-II and Ohio contrast cards respectively. Results: A total of 73 children (mean age of 2.84 ± 1.87 years) were recruited. Sixty-eight parents reported visual concerns that were broadly grouped into 14 unique concerns. Nineteen parents (27.9%) reported more than one visual concern. Difficulty maintaining eye contact and recognizing faces were the top two visual concerns in phases 1 and 2. Missing objects in the lower visual field was the top concern in phase 3. A larger number of visual concerns were reported in phase 1 (43%) than phase 2 (40.6%) and phase 3 (16.2%). Multiple regression analysis revealed that grating acuity, contrast sensitivity and chronological age were able to predict the functional vision, F (3, 55) = 63.0, p < 0.001, r Conclusion: Targeted questions enquiring about eye contact and face recognition can be included in history elicitation in children with CVI in pediatric neurology clinics. In the presence of visual concerns, it will be important to assess grating acuity and contrast sensitivity. A poor functional vision score requires referral for eye examination and vision rehabilitation services.

Indexed as

CVI rangefunctional visionneurological visual impairmentOhio contrast cardsTeller acuity cards-II

Identifiers

PMID37497463
PMCPMC10368111
OpenAlexW4385076841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.