ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2023
Prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in England from 2000 to 2019.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Vitamin D for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Social connection and living with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A qualitative analysis.Journal of health psychology · 2026Article
- Improving case-finding of long-term health problems in disadvantaged communities: A Policy-focused Evidence Brief.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- International comparison of equity gradients in hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Using the Socio-Technical Allocation of Resources (STAR) approach to support chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management resource allocation in integrated care systems in England.Research in health services & regions · 2025Article
- Article
- Identifying Eligibility for Specialist Intervention in COPD from UK Primary Care Data: A "Treatable Traits" Approach.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Observational
- Systematic Review and Development of Recommended Code Lists to Identify Smoking and Vaping Status in Electronic Health Records (EHR).Clinical epidemiology · 2025Review
- Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Cause-Specific Mortality After Hospitalisation in COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
- Incidence, prevalence, and survival of lung cancer in the United Kingdom from 2000-2021: a population-based cohort study.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Patient pathways for four major chronic respiratory diseases in England between 2008 and 2021.BMJ open respiratory research · 2024Article
- An Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometric Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Eighteen Marker Compounds in the Traditional Herbal Formula Bopyeo-Tang.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- UK Electronic Healthcare Records for Research: A Scientometric Analysis of Respiratory, Cardiovascular, and COVID-19 Publications.Pragmatic and observational research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is considerable variation in reported chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) prevalence internationally, partly due to differing definitions in use. Accurate estimates of disease prevalence are important for allocation of health-care resources, yet UK estimates of COPD prevalence have not been updated for a decade. We calculated yearly COPD prevalence in England between 2000 and 2019 using different definitions of COPD. Methods: We used routinely collected primary care electronic healthcare record (EHR) data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum database linked with secondary care data from the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Admitted Patient Care (APC) database. Mid-year point prevalence was calculated yearly from 2000 to 2019 in English adults aged ≥40 years using 5 definitions: (i) validated COPD, (ii) Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) COPD, (iii) COPD symptoms, inhaler prescription, and no asthma diagnosis, (iv) hospitalisation with COPD as any diagnosis, (v) hospitalisation with COPD as primary or secondary diagnosis. Prevalence was further stratified by gender, age group, and region. Results: A total of 12,745,793 people were included over the 20-year period. Annual cohort sizes ranged from 4,373,538 in 2000 to 6,159,496 in 2019. Estimates of COPD prevalence increased every year from 2000 and the difference in estimated prevalence between the validated and QOF definitions has grown over time. In 2019, a COPD prevalence of 4.9% was found using validated events in either primary or secondary care (definition 1 or definition 5). Additionally, including potentially undiagnosed cases (definition 3) in the COPD definition produced an increased prevalence of 6.7%. Conclusion: Common definitions of COPD (eg, QOF codes), may underestimate the true prevalence. The extent of this underestimate has increased over time and could lead to under-allocation of resources where need is estimated based on these definitions. Standardisation of COPD coding in routine EHRs and metrics such as spirometry is key to accurate disease monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.