ArticleJournal of pain research2023
Effect of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Headache Severity and Central µ-Opioid Receptor Availability in Episodic Migraine.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02964741 (Investigation and Modulation of the Mu-Opioid Mechanisms in Migraine), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Investigation and Modulation of the Mu-Opioid Mechanisms in Migraine (in Vivo)
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Migraine: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Episodic Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- High-definition tDCS over primary motor cortex modulates brain signal variability and functional connectivity in episodic migraine.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Trial
- Exploring HD-tDCS Effect on μ-opioid Receptor and Pain Sensitivity in Temporomandibular Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial Study.The journal of pain · 2024Trial
- High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation enhances exercise-induced hypoalgesia in patients with chronic low back pain.iScience · 2026Article
- Kappa opioid receptor availability correlates with depressive symptom burden in chronic migraine: a preliminary investigation.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap: molecular mechanisms, regional activity and connectivity in headache disorders.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Review
- μ-Opioid Receptor Dynamics in the Parameningeal Tissue During Migraine Attacks.Annals of neurology · 2025Article
- Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Single-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Neurocircuitry basis of motor cortex-related analgesia as an emerging approach for chronic pain management.Nature. Mental health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The current understanding of utilizing HD-tDCS as a targeted approach to improve headache attacks and modulate endogenous opioid systems in episodic migraine is relatively limited. This study aimed to determine whether high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) can improve clinical outcomes and endogenous µ-opioid receptor (µOR) availability for episodic migraineurs. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled trial, 25 patients completed 10-daily 20-min M1 HD-tDCS, repeated Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans with a selective agonist for µOR. Twelve age- and sex-matched healthy controls participated in the baseline PET/MRI scan without neuromodulation. The primary endpoints were moderate-to-severe (M/S) headache days and responder rate (≥50% reduction on M/S headache days from baseline), and secondary endpoints included the presence of M/S headache intensity and the use of rescue medication over 1-month after treatment. Results: In a one-month follow-up, at initial analysis, both the active and sham groups exhibited no significant differences in their primary outcomes (M/S headache days and responder rates). Similarly, secondary outcomes (M/S headache intensity and the usage of rescue medication) also revealed no significant differences between the two groups. However, subsequent analyses showed that active M1 HD-tDCS, compared to sham, resulted in a more beneficial response predominantly in higher-frequency individuals (>3 attacks/month), as demonstrated by the interaction between treatment indicator and baseline frequency of migraine attacks on the primary outcomes. These favorable outcomes were also confirmed for the secondary endpoints in higher-frequency patients. Active treatment also resulted in increased µOR concentration compared to sham in the limbic and descending pain modulatory pathway. Our exploratory mediation analysis suggests that the observed clinical efficacy of HD-tDCS in patients with higher-frequency conditions might be potentially mediated through an increase in µOR availability. Conclusion: The 10-daily M1 HD-tDCS can improve clinical outcomes in episodic migraineurs with a higher baseline frequency of migraine attacks (>3 attacks/month). This improvement may be, in part, facilitated by the increase in the endogenous µOR availability. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier - NCT02964741.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.