Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37497288›Full record

ArticleBelitung nursing journal2021

Perceptions of nurse managers and staff nurses regarding Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing theory in general hospitals in Japan.

Youko Nakano, Tomoya Yokotani, Feni Betriana, Chihiro Kawai, Hirokazu Ito, Yuko Yasuhara, Tetsuya Tanioka, Rozzano Locsin, Misao Miyagawa

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Belitung nursing journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Youko NakanoKagawa University Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
Tomoya YokotaniTokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9157-2984
Feni BetrianaGraduate School of Health Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8248-367X
Chihiro KawaiGraduate School of Health Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Hirokazu ItoInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0740-2104
Yuko YasuharaInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9904-2339
Tetsuya TaniokaInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2847-1862
Rozzano LocsinInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6845-213X
Misao MiyagawaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Welfare, Tokushima Bunri University, Tokushima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nurses as primary healthcare providers demonstrate quality nursing care through competencies with healthcare technologies, while nurse managers assume the primacy of managing quality healthcare in their respective care settings. However, little is known about perceptions of the influence of care technologies on their nursing practice. Objective: This study aimed to determine managers' and staff nurses' perceptions regarding the Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing (TCCN) theory in general hospitals in Japan. Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional survey design, with 421 participants selected using a stratified sampling method. Technological Competency as Caring in Nursing Instrument-Revised (TCCNI-R) was used for online data collection using Survey Monkey©. Data were analyzed using Welch's t-test and ANOVA. Results: Nurses with years of experience within the range of 20 to less than 30 years showed the highest TCCNI-R scores among the two groups. Nurses who had received education on caring in nursing showed significant differences for Factor 2 (Technological Competency as Caring), that of expressing Technological Competency as Caring. Three other factors showed no significant difference, namely in Factor 1 (Nursing Expression as Caring), Factor 3 (Technology and Caring), and Factor 4 (Technological Knowing). However, the average scores of these factors were high, which reflect high professional ethics and occupational discipline and increased awareness of caring in nursing. It was also found that the nurse managers were more aware of the TCCN than were the staff nurses. The nurse managers were also more aware of providing care using technology, recognizing the need-to-know patient needs through technology and providing care to the ever-changing patient's condition. Conclusion: The study discovered that continuing education is needed regarding the practice of nursing based on theory, enabling appropriate and accurate understanding of practicing knowing persons as caring in nursing.

Indexed as

advanced technologiescaring in nursingin-service educationJapannurse administratorsnursing stafftechnological competency

Identifiers

PMID37497288
PMCPMC10367991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.