Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37497191›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2023

Synthetic computed tomography for low-field magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancer using residual vision transformers.

Agustina La Greca Saint-Esteven, Ricardo Dal Bello, Mariia Lapaeva, Lisa Fankhauser, Bertrand Pouymayou, Ender Konukoglu, Nicolaus Andratschke, Panagiotis Balermpas, Matthias Guckenberger, Stephanie Tanadini-Lang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep Learning for CT Synthesis in Radiotherapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Agustina La Greca Saint-EstevenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland.
Ricardo Dal BelloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland.
Mariia LapaevaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland.
Lisa FankhauserDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland.
Bertrand PouymayouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland.
Ender KonukogluComputer Vision Laboratory, Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Sternwartstrasse 7, Zurich 8092, Switzerland.
Nicolaus AndratschkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland.
Panagiotis BalermpasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland.
Matthias GuckenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland.
Stephanie Tanadini-LangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Synthetic computed tomography (sCT) scans are necessary for dose calculation in magnetic resonance (MR)-only radiotherapy. While deep learning (DL) has shown remarkable performance in generating sCT scans from MR images, research has predominantly focused on high-field MR images. This study presents the first implementation of a DL model for sCT generation in head-and-neck (HN) cancer using low-field MR images. Specifically, the use of vision transformers (ViTs) was explored. Materials and methods: The dataset consisted of 31 patients, resulting in 196 pairs of deformably-registered computed tomography (dCT) and MR scans. The latter were obtained using a balanced steady-state precession sequence on a 0.35T scanner. Residual ViTs were trained on 2D axial, sagittal, and coronal slices, respectively, and the final sCTs were generated by averaging the models' outputs. Different image similarity metrics, dose volume histogram (DVH) deviations, and gamma analyses were computed on the test set (n = 6). The overlap between auto-contours on sCT scans and manual contours on MR images was evaluated for different organs-at-risk using the Dice score. Results: The median [range] value of the test mean absolute error was 57 [37-74] HU. DVH deviations were below 1% for all structures. The median gamma passing rates exceeded 94% in the 2%/2mm analysis (threshold = 90%). The median Dice scores were above 0.7 for all organs-at-risk. Conclusions: The clinical applicability of DL-based sCT generation from low-field MR images in HN cancer was proved. High sCT-dCT similarity and dose metric accuracy were achieved, and sCT suitability for organs-at-risk auto-delineation was shown.

Identifiers

PMID37497191
PMCPMC10366636
OpenAlexW4383619827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.