Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37497185›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2023

Trends in computerized provider order entry: 20-year bibliometric overview.

Laura Gosselin, Romain Leguillon, Laetitia Rollin, Emeline Lejeune, Stéfan J Darmoni, Julien Grosjean

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura GosselinDepartment of Digital Health, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Romain LeguillonDepartment of Digital Health, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Laetitia RollinLaboratoire D'Informatique Médicale et D'Ingénierie des Connaissances en e-Santé (LIMICS), U1142, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Emeline LejeuneDepartment of Digital Health, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Stéfan J DarmoniDepartment of Digital Health, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Julien GrosjeanDepartment of Digital Health, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Université de Rouen Normandie · FRLaboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances en e-SantéInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Drug-related problems (DRPs) can lead to serious health issues and have significant economic impacts on healthcare systems. One solution to address this issue is the use of computerized physician order entry systems (CPOE), which can help prevent DRPs by reducing the risk of medication errors. Objective: The purpose of this study is to provide an analysis on scientific production of the past 20 years in order to describe trends in academic publishing on CPOE and to identify the major topics as well as the predominant actors (journals, countries) involved in this field. Methods: A PubMed search was carried out to extract articles related to computerized provider order entry during the period January 1st 2003- December 31st 2022 using a specific query. Data were downloaded from PubMed in Extensible Markup Language (XML) and were processed through a dedicated parser. Results: A total of 2,946 articles were retrieved among 623 journals. One third of these articles were published in eight journals. Publications grew strongly from 2002 to 2006, with a dip in 2008 followed by an increase again in 2009. After 2009, there follows a decreasing until 2022.The most producing countries are the USA with 51.39% of the publication over the period by France (3.80%), and Canada (3.77%). About disciplines, the top 3 is: "medical informatics" (21.62% of articles), "pharmacy" (19.04%), and "pediatrics" (6.56%). Discussion: This study provides an overview of publication trends related to CPOE, which exhibited a significant increase in the first decade of the 21st century followed by a decline after 2009. Possible reasons for this decline include the emergence of digital health tools beyond CPOE, as well as healthcare professionals experiencing alert fatigue of the current system. Conclusion: Future research should focus on analyzing publication trends in the field of medical informatics and decision-making tools to identify other areas of interest that may have surpassed the development of CPOE.

Indexed as

bibliometricbibliometric analysisCPOE (computerized physician order entry)CPOE (computerized prescriber order entry)medical order entry systems

Identifiers

PMID37497185
PMCPMC10367087
OpenAlexW4383879223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.