ReviewOpen respiratory archives
[Pulmonary Rehabilitation: From Theory to Practice].
Review in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been seen to be useful not only in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, but also in other non-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease respiratory diseases. It is highly effective in improving dyspnea, exercise tolerance, and health-related quality of life, and is supported by a high level of evidence and grade of recommendation. In recent years, PR has been shown to be equally effective in both the hospital and home setting, and can even be used in telemedicine. The recommended timing of PR after an exacerbation has also changed following evidence that early intervention is more beneficial and has no negative impact on side effects. However, to achieve maximum effect while avoiding risk, each patient must be evaluated by the PR team, and rehabilitation must be tailored to their needs and capabilities. In recent years, new, simpler strategies have been put forward to give all potential candidates access to PR. This approach should help achieve greater adherence to rehabilitation programs and maintain long-term benefits, primarily by influencing patient lifestyles and encouraging physical activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.