Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37497148›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health in Africa2022

"How is the availability of public health workers in Indonesia's primary health care? Secondary data analysis of health facility research in 2019".

Dian Mawarni, Sabran Sabran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health in Africa, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dian MawarniDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Sport Science, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, East Java.
Sabran SabranDepartment of Health, Politeknik Negeri Jember, Jember, East Java, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack and maldistribution of public health workers are critical issues for primary health care. This study aimed to assess the availability of public health workers at primary health care and to identify its related factors. We use secondary data from health facility research in 2019. Overall, 68.79% of primary health care in rural areas and 71.33% of primary health care in remote areas have the number of public health workers fit standards, but urban areas only reach 46.82%. The public health worker from health promotion and behavior concentration is more dominantly fulfilled than others. Accreditation status is a determinant factor of the availability of public health workers in urban and rural primary health care. Especially remote primary health care, it is not only affected by accreditation status but also service capability. The government needs to review the policy of public health worker recruitment at primary health care to support the fulfillment of public health workers. Public health education should start considering career development programs to ensure that all graduates from various concentrations can be absorbed into the workforce.

Indexed as

Career planningHuman resources for healthPublic health graduatespublic health workforceWorkforce policy

Identifiers

PMID37497148
PMCPMC10367020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.