Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37496786›Full record

ArticleCJC open2023

Design of the

Marie-A Chaix, Annie Dore, Blandine Mondésert, François-Pierre Mongeon, Véronique Roy, Marie-Claude Guertin, Michel White, Réda Ibrahim, Eileen O'Meara, Jean-Lucien Rouleau and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marie-A ChaixAdult Congenital Heart Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Annie DoreAdult Congenital Heart Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Blandine MondésertAdult Congenital Heart Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
François-Pierre MongeonAdult Congenital Heart Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Véronique RoyAdult Congenital Heart Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Claude GuertinMontreal Health Innovations Coordinating Centre (MHICC), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Michel WhiteHeart Failure Clinic, Montreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Réda IbrahimAdult Congenital Heart Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Eileen O'MearaHeart Failure Clinic, Montreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jean-Lucien RouleauHeart Failure Clinic, Montreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Paul KhairyAdult Congenital Heart Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
PARACYS-RV investigators
Montreal Heart Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of a systemic right ventricle (sRV) with biventricular physiology (biV) is associated with increased patient morbidity and mortality. To date, no pharmacologic therapy for heart failure has been proven effective for patients with systolic dysfunction of the sRV-biV. We designed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial to compare sacubitril/valsartan treatment to placebo in adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with moderate-to-severe sRV-biV dysfunction and New York Heart Association functional class II to III symptoms. Two primary efficacy endpoints are assessed in the trial: exercise capacity (submaximal exercise duration) and neurohormonal activation (N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide). Secondary objectives include assessing a change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score and evaluating the safety and tolerance of sacubitril/valsartan. A 6-week open run-in phase identifies the maximum tolerated dose of sacubitril/valsartan, up to 97 mg/103 mg twice daily. After a 2-week washout period, patients are randomized 1:1 to sacubitril/valsartan treatment vs placebo for a 24-week phase, followed by another 2-week washout period and subsequent crossover to the alternative treatment arm for an additional 24-week phase. Data to assess primary and secondary endpoints are collected at baseline and at the end of each phase. A total of 48 patients is required to provide > 80% power to detect a 30% difference in distance walked and in N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide levels with sacubitril/valsartan treatment vs placebo, each with a 2-sided

Identifiers

PMID37496786
PMCPMC10366661
OpenAlexW4367056115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.