Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37496560›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2023

Whole slide imaging (WSI) scanner differences influence optical and computed properties of digitized prostate cancer histology.

Savannah R Duenweg, Samuel A Bobholz, Allison K Lowman, Margaret A Stebbins, Aleksandra Winiarz, Biprojit Nath, Fitzgerald Kyereme, Kenneth A Iczkowski, Peter S LaViolette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Overcoming Variability in RNAscope Image Analysis: A HALO-Based Approach.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  6. [Research progress and future prospects for artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of fatty liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Using artificial intelligence to prioritize pathology samples: report of a test drive.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Savannah R DuenwegDepartments of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Samuel A BobholzDepartment of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Allison K LowmanDepartment of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Margaret A StebbinsDepartments of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Aleksandra WiniarzDepartments of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Biprojit NathDepartments of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Fitzgerald KyeremeDepartment of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Kenneth A IczkowskiDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Peter S LaVioletteDepartments of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.

Funding

Prostate Cancer Radio-Pathomics for Differentiating Clinically Significant DiseaseR01CA249882 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI LAVIOLETTE, PETER S · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
Brain Cancer Radio-Pathomics for Predicting Heterogeneous CytologyR01CA218144 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI LAVIOLETTE, PETER S · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218144NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Digital pathology is becoming an increasingly popular area of advancement in both research and clinically. Pathologists are now able to manage and interpret slides digitally, as well as collaborate with external pathologists with digital copies of slides. Differences in slide scanners include variation in resolution, image contrast, and optical properties, which may influence downstream image processing. This study tested the hypothesis that varying slide scanners would result in differences in computed pathomic features on prostate cancer whole mount slides. Design: This study collected 192 unique tissue slides from 30 patients following prostatectomy. Tissue samples were paraffin-embedded, stained for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and digitized using 3 different scanning microscopes at the highest available magnification rate, for a total of 3 digitized slides per tissue slide. These scanners included a ( Results: Each mean color channel intensity (i.e., Red, Green, Blue) differed between slide scanners (all Conclusion: This study demonstrates that both optical and computed properties of digitized histological samples are impacted by slide scanner differences. Future research is warranted to better understand which scanner properties influence the tissue segmentation process and to develop harmonization techniques for comparing data across multiple slide scanners.

Indexed as

Digital pathologyDigital slide scannersHistologyHistomorphometric features

Identifiers

PMID37496560
PMCPMC10365953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.