ArticleCureus2023
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Chatbots in Medicine: A Supplement, Not a Substitute.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Warmth of Medicine: The Irreplaceability of Doctors in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Pilot Study Comparing Emergency Physician and Artificial Intelligence-supported Interpretations of Electrocardiograms.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence chatbots in oral pathology: a scoping review of applications, accuracy, and limitations.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Patient and clinician engagement with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI): A scoping review of implications for patient-centered communication.Patient education and counseling · 2026Article
- Integrating Generative AI Into Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support: Viewpoint on Research and Practice Considerations.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Innovative Application of Chatbots in Clinical Nutrition Education: The E+DIEting_Lab Experience in University Students.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Mental health chatbots and their technical features: A systematic review of reviews and a thematic analysis.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Article
- Application of the artificial intelligence-assisted World Café teaching model in clinical pharmacology graduate course: a pilot study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Public attitudes and practices toward using AI chatbots for healthcare assistance: a multinational cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- AI chatbots as 'pocket doctors': intimate health support for young women in Lebanon.BMC public health · 2025Article
- What patients want from healthcare chatbots: insights from a mixed-methods study.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Development of a Conversational Artificial Intelligence-Based Web Application for Medical Consultations: Prototype Study.JMIRx med · 2025Article
- Students' perceptions of AI mental health chatbots: an exploratory qualitative study at Sultan Qaboos University.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in the prescription of acute medical treatments in primary healthcare - comparison of the performance of family physicians and ChatGPT.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Evaluation of an Online Survey for Pertussis Case Investigations in Regional Queensland: Impacts on Workload and Disease Trends.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Healthy Heart Assistant, a WhatsApp-Based Generative Pretrained Transformer Technology, for Self-Care in Hypertensive Patients.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Article
- Expert evaluation of ChatGPT accuracy and reliability for basic celiac disease frequently asked questions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This editorial discusses the role of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots in the healthcare sector, emphasizing their potential as supplements rather than substitutes for medical professionals. While AI chatbots have demonstrated significant potential in managing routine tasks, processing vast amounts of data, and aiding in patient education, they still lack the empathy, intuition, and experience intrinsic to human healthcare providers. Furthermore, the deployment of AI in medicine brings forth ethical and legal considerations that require robust regulatory measures. As we move towards the future, the editorial underscores the importance of a collaborative model, wherein AI chatbots and medical professionals work together to optimize patient outcomes. Despite the potential for AI advancements, the likelihood of chatbots completely replacing medical professionals remains low, as the complexity of healthcare necessitates human involvement. The ultimate aim should be to use technology like AI chatbots to enhance patient care and outcomes, not to replace the irreplaceable human elements of healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.