Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37496517›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's health2023

Alternate Birth Strategies.

Julie R Whittington, Taylor Ghahremani, Megan Whitham, Amy M Phillips, Bethany N Spracher, Everett F Magann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julie R WhittingtonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Navy Medicine Readiness and Training Command Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6947-2896
Taylor GhahremaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Megan WhithamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Amy M PhillipsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Bethany N SpracherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Edward via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3052-8052
Everett F MagannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6823-7635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community birth is defined as birth that occurs outside the hospital setting. Birthing in a birth center can be safe for certain patient populations. Home birth can also be safe in well-selected patient with a well-established transfer infrastructure should an emergency occur. Unfortunately, many areas of the United States and the world do not have this infrastructure, limiting access to safe community birth. Immersion during labor has been associated with decreased need for epidural and pain medication. Delivery should not occur in water due to concerns for infection and cord avulsion. Umbilical cord non-severance (also called lotus birth) and placentophagy should be counseled against due to well-documented risks without clear benefit. Birth plans and options should be regularly discussed during pregnancy visits.

Indexed as

community birthhome birthimmersion in labormaternal outcomesperinatal outcomesplacentophagywater birth

Identifiers

PMID37496517
PMCPMC10368118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.