Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37496366›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2023

Exposure-safety and exposure-efficacy analyses for tisotumab vedotin for patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

Chaitali Passey, Jenna Voellinger, Leonid Gibiansky, Rudy Gunawan, Leonardo Nicacio, Ibrahima Soumaoro, William D Hanley, Helen Winter, Manish Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chaitali PasseyGenmab US, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Jenna VoellingerSeagen Inc., Bothell, Washington, USA.
Leonid GibianskyQuantPharm LLC, North Potomac, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6005-7760
Rudy GunawanSeagen Inc., Bothell, Washington, USA.
Leonardo NicacioSeagen Inc., Bothell, Washington, USA.
Ibrahima SoumaoroGenmab US, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
William D HanleySeagen Inc., Bothell, Washington, USA.
Helen WinterGilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, California, USA.
Manish GuptaGenmab US, Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Seagen (United States) · USGenmab (United States) · USGilead Sciences (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) tisotumab vedotin (TV) received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of adults with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC) with disease progression on or after chemotherapy. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model, developed using dosing data from four clinical TV studies, was used to estimate individual exposure and explore safety and efficacy exposure-response (ER) relationships. Because PK analysis showed no appreciable accumulation of TV and monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) with repeated dosing, cycle 1 exposure metrics and predicted average concentrations from time zero until end of the cycle in which an event occurred (C

Indexed as

ImmunoconjugatesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansOligopeptidesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmunoconjugatesOligopeptidestisotumab vedotin

Identifiers

PMID37496366
PMCPMC10508544
OpenAlexW4385294498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.