Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37496100›Full record

ArticleNeurological research and practice2023

SOP: acute hyperkinetic movement disorders.

Anna Sauerbier, Alexandra Gronostay, Haidar S Dafsari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna SauerbierFaculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Alexandra GronostayFaculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Haidar S DafsariFaculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. haidar.dafsari@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8849-4233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMovement disorders emergencies describe acute-onset neurological conditions in which a delay of recognition and treatment may cause severe morbidity and mortality of patients. Hyperkinetic movement disorders include tremor, chorea/ballism, dystonia, myoclonus, and tics. Here we present a standard operating procedure (SOP) for the diagnostic work-up and different treatment options depending on the phenomenology as well as the aetiology of underlying diseases. COMMENTS: The recognition of the phenomenology is essential for the symptomatic therapy of the acute movement disorder and forms the basis for the choice of ancillary investigations to confirm the suspected underlying causes. Furthermore, we summarise diagnostic techniques, including blood and cerebrospinal fluid tests and neuroimaging, which provide rapid results and are useful for the indication of causal treatments of specific acute movement disorders.

conclusionsDespite their acute nature, most of these conditions can result in good clinical outcomes, if recognised early.

Identifiers

PMID37496100
PMCPMC10373268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.