ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2023
Extracting Quantitative Ultrasonic Parameters from the Backscatter Coefficient.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound structure function for quantitative assessment of steatotic liver disease based on total severity score.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- Robust domain selection for functional data via interval-wise testing and effect size mapping.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2026Article
- Sticky Hard-Sphere Model for Characterizing Tumor Microstructure via Quantitative Ultrasound.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ultrasonic backscatter coefficient (BSC) is a fundamental quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameter that contains rich information about the underlying tissue. Deriving parameters from the BSC is essential for fully utilizing the information contained in BSC for tissue characterization. In this chapter, we review two primary approaches for extracting parameters from the BSC versus frequency curve: the model-based approach and the model-free approach, focusing on the model-based approach, where a scattering model is fit to the observed BSC to yield model parameters. For this approach, we will attempt to unite commonly used models under a coherent theoretical framework. We will focus on the underlying assumptions and conditions for various BSC models. Computer code is provided to facilitate the use of some of the models. The strengths and weaknesses of various models are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37495914What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.