Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37495911›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2023

Quantitative Ultrasound: An Emerging Technology for Detecting, Diagnosing, Imaging, Evaluating, and Monitoring Disease.

Ernest J Feleppa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 67% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ernest J FeleppaDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Center for Ultrasound Research and Translation (CURT), Boston, MA, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound has been a popular clinical imaging modality for decades. It is a well-established means of displaying the macroscopic anatomy of soft-tissue structures. While conventional ultrasound methods, i.e., B-mode and Doppler methods, are well proven and continue to advance technically in many ways, e.g., by extending into higher frequencies and taking advantage of harmonic phenomena in tissues, fundamentally new so-called quantitative ultrasound (QUS) technologies also are emerging and offer exciting promise for making significant improvements in clinical imaging and characterization of disease. These emerging quantitative methods include spectrum analysis, image statistics, elasticity imaging, contrast-agent methods, and flow-detection and -measurement techniques. Each provides independent information. When used alone, each can provide clinically valuable imaging capabilities; when combined with each other, their capabilities may be more powerful in many applications. Furthermore, all can be used fused with other imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic-resonance (MR), positron-emission-tomography (PET), or single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) imaging, to offer possibly even greater improvements in detecting, diagnosing, imaging, evaluating, and monitoring disease. This chapter focuses on QUS methods that are based on spectrum analysis and image statistics.

Indexed as

UltrasonographyEnvelope statisticsParametric imagingScatteringSpectrumTissue-typing

Identifiers

PMID37495911
OpenAlexW4385267452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.