ArticleScientific reports2023
Prospective study to evaluate quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative rare disease characterized by symptoms and signs in the upper and lower motor neurons, leading to progressive neuro-degeneration and muscle atrophy. Our objective was to analyse the quality of life (QoL) in patients with ALS and compare with general population and with patients with cancer. Prospective study from consecutive ALS patients in one center. In order to assess quality of life, during the first visit three questionnaires were administered: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R), Short Form-36 (SF-36) and EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D). We compared SF-36 of ALS patients with a reference population (n = 9151), and we compared the EQ-5D index score of ALS patients versus patients with cancer in the same area and in the same period (2015-2018). Between June 2015 and September 2017, 23 were included. The mean age was 65.1 ± 12.6 years and 56.5% were women. Compared with the general population, patients with ALS showed lowest QoL (p < 0.05) in all the dimensions, with a very important impairment in physical function (median: 0; p25-75: 0-10) and physical role (median: 0; p25-75: 0-6.25). In EQ-5D questionnaire, patients with ALS presented an EQ-5D index score of 0.21 ± 0.39 (mean ± standard deviation) with a visual analog scale (VAS) score of 0.32 ± 0.24. Compared with an oncological population, patients with ALS had a worse EQ-5D index score both clinically and statistically (0.21 ± 0.39 vs. 0.77 ± 0.27; p < 0.05). We demonstrate a poorer quality of life in patients with ALS is poor, and clinically and statistically worse than in patients with cancer or general population. New studies need to evaluate the impact of strategies in this population to improve the quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.