Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37495585›Full record

ArticleScientific data2023

AtOM, an ontology model to standardize use of brain atlases in tools, workflows, and data infrastructures.

Heidi Kleven, Thomas H Gillespie, Lyuba Zehl, Timo Dickscheid, Jan G Bjaalie, Maryann E Martone, Trygve B Leergaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Community Standard Multispecies Cell Atlas of the Basal Ganglia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chemoarchitectural studies of the rat hypothalamus and zona incerta.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heidi Kleven *Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3710-321X
Thomas H Gillespie *Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Lyuba ZehlInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5947-9939
Timo DickscheidInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-1), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Jan G BjaalieDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7899-906X
Maryann E MartoneDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8406-3871
Trygve B LeergaardDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. t.b.leergaard@medisin.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0001-5965-8470

Funding

Neurosciences Graduate Training ProgramT32NS061847 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Brenda L Bloodgood · 2008 to 2026
$7.7M
EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 785907EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 945539Helmholtz Association InterLabs-0015NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS061847Norges Forskningsråd (Research Council of Norway) 269774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain atlases are important reference resources for accurate anatomical description of neuroscience data. Open access, three-dimensional atlases serve as spatial frameworks for integrating experimental data and defining regions-of-interest in analytic workflows. However, naming conventions, parcellation criteria, area definitions, and underlying mapping methodologies differ considerably between atlases and across atlas versions. This lack of standardized description impedes use of atlases in analytic tools and registration of data to different atlases. To establish a machine-readable standard for representing brain atlases, we identified four fundamental atlas elements, defined their relations, and created an ontology model. Here we present our Atlas Ontology Model (AtOM) and exemplify its use by applying it to mouse, rat, and human brain atlases. We discuss how AtOM can facilitate atlas interoperability and data integration, thereby increasing compliance with the FAIR guiding principles. AtOM provides a standardized framework for communication and use of brain atlases to create, use, and refer to specific atlas elements and versions. We argue that AtOM will accelerate analysis, sharing, and reuse of neuroscience data.

Indexed as

Atlases as TopicBrainAnimalsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiceRatsWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID37495585
PMCPMC10372146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.