Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37495522›Full record

ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2023

Modified Unilateral Approach for Ventrally Located Spinal Tumors.

Han Soo Chang, Fumiya Sano, Takatoshi Sorimachi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Han Soo ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokai University.
Fumiya SanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokai University.
Takatoshi SorimachiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tokai University.
Tokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery on spinal tumors becomes challenging when the tumor is ventral to the spinal cord. Conventionally, we approach it posteriorly through bilateral laminectomy and rotate the cord after sectioning the dentate ligament and nerve roots. However, manipulating the cord can be hazardous, and a long bilateral laminectomy can be invasive. Meanwhile, a narrow operative field and a limited lateral viewing angle in a unilateral approach constrained the surgeon. To overcome these problems, we previously reported a technique of modified unilateral approach where we incised the skin and the fascia horizontally and placed a pair of retractors longitudinally.The current article reports our experience applying this approach in 15 patients with ventrally located spinal tumors. The approach was performed on 10 schwannomas, 2 meningiomas, and 3 others. We evaluated paraspinal muscle atrophy on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.The modified unilateral approach provided an excellent surgical field for removing ventrally located tumors. Gross total removal was achieved in 11 patients (92% of benign tumors). No neurological complications occurred except for one case of transient weakness. We encountered no wound-related late complications such as pain or deformity. The reduction of the cross-sectional area of the paraspinal muscles on the approach side (compared to the nonapproach side) was 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.72-1.06), indicating 7% atrophy (statistically nonsignificant, p = 0.48).We believe this simple technique can be useful for removing spinal tumors located ventral to the spinal cord.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaSpinal Cord NeoplasmsSpinal NeoplasmsAtrophyHumansLaminectomyTreatment Outcomespinal meningiomaspinal schwannomaspinal tumorsurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID37495522
PMCPMC10687673
OpenAlexW4385195790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.