Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37494567›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2023

The Effect of Historical Data-Based Informative Prior on Benchmark Dose Estimation of Toxicogenomics.

Chao Ji, Kan Shao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chao JiDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health - Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, United States.
Kan ShaoDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health - Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5512-2377

Funding

Develop and Commercialize the Bayesian Dose-Response Modeling System and ServicesR42ES032642 · NIEHS · KS AND ASSOCIATES, LLC · PI SHAO, KAN · 2020 to 2021
$2.0M
Software and services to advance dose-response modeling in chemical risk assesmentR41TR002567 · NCATS · KS AND ASSOCIATES, LLC · PI SHAO, KAN · 2018 to 2019
$300k
NCATS NIH HHS R41 TR002567NIEHS NIH HHS R42 ES032642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput toxicogenomics as an advanced toolbox of Tox21 plays an increasingly important role in facilitating the toxicity assessment of environmental chemicals. However, toxicogenomic dose-response analyses are typically challenged by limited data, which may result in significant uncertainties in parameter and benchmark dose (BMD) estimation. Integrating historical data via prior distribution using a Bayesian method is a useful but not-well-studied strategy. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of informative priors in genomic dose-response modeling and BMD estimation. Specifically, we aim to identify plausible informative priors and evaluate their effects on BMD estimates at both gene and pathway levels. A general informative prior and eight time-specific (from 3 h to 29 d) informative priors for seven commonly used continuous dose-response models were derived. Results suggest that the derived informative priors are sensitive to the specific data sets used for elicitation. Real data-based simulations indicate that BMD estimation with the time-specific informative priors can achieve increased or equivalent accuracy, significantly decreased uncertainty, and a slightly enhanced correlation with the points of departure estimated from apical end points than the counterparts with noninformative priors. Overall, our study systematically examined the effects of historical data-based informative priors on BMD estimates, highlighting the benefits of plausible information priors in advancing the practice of toxicogenomics.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalBayes TheoremToxicogenetics

Identifiers

PMID37494567
PMCPMC10462436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.