Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37494409›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Primary health care utilization in the first year after arrival by refugee sponsorship model in Ontario, Canada: A population-based cohort study.

Susitha Wanigaratne, Jennifer Rayner, Richard H Glazier, Therese A Stukel, Hong Lu, Sima Gandhi, Natasha R Saunders, Michaela Hynie, Anja Kilibarda, Astrid Guttmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Unpacking the Mystery of the Ontario Healthcare System in Canada: Ukrainian Temporary Migrants and Healthcare System Navigation.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Susitha WanigaratneEdwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0840-9006
Jennifer RaynerInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Richard H GlazierICES, Toronto, Canada.
Therese A StukelICES, Toronto, Canada.
Hong LuICES, Toronto, Canada.
Sima GandhiICES, Toronto, Canada.
Natasha R SaundersEdwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Michaela HynieDepartment of Psychology/Centre for Refugee Studies, York University, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9266-9902
Anja KilibardaColumbia University Department of Political Science, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Astrid GuttmannEdwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CACity University of New York · USSt. Michael's Hospital · CAYork University · CA

Funding

CIHR PJT 155917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanada's approach to refugee resettlement includes government sponsorship, a pioneering private sponsorship model and a third blended approach. Refugees are selected and supported differently in each approach including healthcare navigation. Little is known about how well private sponsors facilitate primary care navigation and whether this changed during the large-scale 2015 Syrian resettlement initiative characterized by civic and healthcare systems engagement. METHODS AND

findingsPopulation-based cohort study of resettled refugees arriving in Ontario between April 1, 2008 and March 31, 2017, with one-year follow-up, using linked health and demographic administrative databases. We evaluated associations of resettlement model (GARs, Privately Sponsored Refugees [PSRs], and Blended-Visa Office Referred [BVORs]) by era of arrival (pre-Syrian and Syrian era) and by country cohort, on measures of primary care (PC) navigation using adjusted Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression. There were 34,591 (pre-Syrian) and 24,757 (Syrian era) resettled refugees, approximately half of whom were GARs. Compared with the reference group pre-Syrian era PSRs, Syrian PSRs had slightly earlier PC visits (mean = 116 days [SD = 90]) (adjusted hazard ratios [aHR] = 1.19, 95% CI 1.14-1.23). Syrian GARs (mean = 72 days [SD = 65]) and BVORs (mean = 73 days [SD = 76]) had their first PC visit sooner than pre-Syrian era PSRs (mean = 149 days [SD = 86]), with respective aHRs 2.27, 95% CI 2.19-2.35 and 1.89, 95% CI 1.79-1.99. Compared to pre-Syrian PSRs, Syrian GARs and BVORs had much greater odds of a CHC visit (adjusted odds ratios 14.69, 95% CI 12.98-16.63 and 14.08, 95% 12.05-16.44 respectively) and Syrian PSRs had twice the odds of a CHC visit.

conclusionsLess timely primary care and lower odds of a CHC visit among PSRs in the first year may be attributed to selection factors and gaps in sponsors' knowledge of healthcare navigation. Improved primary care navigation outcomes in the Syrian era suggests successful health systems engagement.

Indexed as

RefugeesCohort StudiesData CollectionHumansOntarioPatient Acceptance of Health CareSyria

Identifiers

PMID37494409
PMCPMC10370760
OpenAlexW4385284329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.