Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37494391›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Imaging feature-based clustering of financial time series.

Jun Wu, Zelin Zhang, Rui Tong, Yuan Zhou, Zhengfa Hu, Kaituo Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun WuSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Optical Engineering, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shi Yan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2849-0342
Zelin ZhangSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Optical Engineering, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shi Yan, China.
Rui TongSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Optical Engineering, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shi Yan, China.
Yuan ZhouSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Optical Engineering, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shi Yan, China.
Zhengfa HuSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Optical Engineering, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shi Yan, China.
Kaituo LiuSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Optical Engineering, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shi Yan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timeseries representation underpin our ability to understand and predict the change of natural system. Series are often predicated on our choice of highly redundant factors, and in fact, the system is driven by a much smaller set of latent intrinsic keys. It means that a better representation of data makes points in phase space clearly for researchers. Specially, a 2D structure of timeseries could combine the trend and correlation characters of different periods in timeseries together, which provides more clear information for top tasks. In this work, the effectiveness of 2D structure of timeseries is investigated in clustering tasks. There are 4 kinds of methods that the Recurrent Plot (RP), the Gramian Angular Summation Field (GASF), the Gramian Angular Differential Field (GADF) and the Markov Transition Field (MTF) have been adopted in the analysis. By classifying the CSI300 and S&P500 indexes, we found that the RP imaging series are valid in recognizing abnormal fluctuations of financial timeseries, as the silhouette values of clusters are over 0.6 to 1. Compared with segment methods, the 2D models have the lowest instability value of 0. It verifies that the SIFT features of RP images take advantage of the volatility of financial series for clustering tasks.

Indexed as

Time FactorsCluster Analysis

Identifiers

PMID37494391
PMCPMC10370745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.