Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37494384›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Ethical considerations in the prehospital treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A multi-centre, qualitative study.

Louise Milling, Dorthe Susanne Nielsen, Jeannett Kjær, Lars Grassmé Binderup, Caroline Schaffalitzky de Muckadell, Helle Collatz Christensen, Erika Frischknecht Christensen, Annmarie Touborg Lassen, Søren Mikkelsen

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Louise MillingDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Prehospital Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8320-5391
Dorthe Susanne NielsenDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jeannett KjærDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Prehospital Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7568-5070
Lars Grassmé BinderupDepartment for the Study of Culture, Philosophy, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Caroline Schaffalitzky de MuckadellDepartment for the Study of Culture, Philosophy, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Helle Collatz ChristensenThe Danish Clinical Quality Program, National Clinical Registries, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Erika Frischknecht ChristensenCentre for Prehospital and Emergency Research, Aalborg University Hospital and Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Annmarie Touborg LassenEmergency Medicine Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Søren MikkelsenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Prehospital Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKAalborg University Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrehospital emergency physicians have to navigate complex decision-making in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treatment that includes ethical considerations. This study explores Danish prehospital physicians' experiences of ethical issues influencing their decision-making during OHCA.

methodsWe conducted a multisite ethnographic study. Through convenience sampling, we included 17 individual interviews with prehospital physicians and performed 22 structured observations on the actions of the prehospital personnel during OHCAs. We collected data during more than 800 observation hours in the Danish prehospital setting between December 2019 and April 2022. Data were analysed with thematic analysis.

resultsAll physicians experienced ethical considerations that influenced their decision-making in a complex interrelated process. We identified three overarching themes in the ethical considerations: Expectations towards patient prognosis and expectations from relatives, bystanders, and colleagues involved in the cardiac arrest; the values and beliefs of the physician and values and beliefs of others involved in the cardiac arrest treatment; and dilemmas encountered in decision-making such as conflicting values.

conclusionThis extensive qualitative study provides an in-depth look at aspects of ethical considerations in decision-making in prehospital resuscitation and found aspects of ethical decision-making that could be harmful to both physicians and patients, such as difficulties in handling advance directives and potential unequal outcomes of the decision-making. The results call for multifaceted interventions on a wider societal level with a focus on advance care planning, education of patients and relatives, and interventions towards prehospital clinicians for a better understanding and awareness of ethical aspects of decision-making.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Medical ServicesOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestHumansPrognosisQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID37494384
PMCPMC10370897
OpenAlexW4385281364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.