Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37493936›Full record

ArticleSpine deformity2023

Assessment of reliability and validity of a handheld surface spine scanner for measuring trunk rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Jack Z Wei, Berry K C Cheung, Sunny L H Chu, Parker Y L Tsang, Michael K T To, Johnson Y N Lau, Kenneth M C Cheung

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Spine deformity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Repeatability and intra and interrater reproducibility of the DIPA-S eHealth© capture and analysis system for clinical assessment of scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jack Z WeiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Berry K C CheungAvalon SpineCare (HK) Ltd., Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sunny L H ChuAvalon SpineCare (HK) Ltd., Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Parker Y L TsangAvalon SpineCare (HK) Ltd., Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Michael K T ToDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Johnson Y N LauAvalon SpineCare (HK) Ltd., Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Kenneth M C CheungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China. cheungmc@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8304-0419
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

Health and Medical Research Fund 07182466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the reliability and validity of a handheld scanner (SpineScan3D) for trunk rotation measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) subjects, as compared with Scoliometer.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study with AIS subjects recruited. Biplanar spine radiographs were performed using an EOS imaging system with coronal Cobb angle (CCA) determined. The angle of trunk rotation (ATR) was measured using Scoliometer. SpineScan3D was employed to assess the axial rotation of subjects' back at forward bending, recorded as surface tilt angle (STA). Intra- and inter-examiner repeats were conducted to evaluate the reliability of SpineScan3D.

results97 AIS patients were recruited. Intra- and inter-examiner reliability of STA measures were good to excellent in major thoracic and lumbar curves (p < 0.001). A strong correlation was found between STA and ATR measures in both curve types (p < 0.001) with a standard error of the ATR estimate of between 1 and 2 degrees from linear regression models (R squared: 0.8-0.9, p < 0.001). A similar correlation with CCA was found for STA and ATR measures (r: 0.5-0.6, p < 0.002), which also demonstrated a similar sensitivity (72%-74%) and specificity (62%-77%) for diagnosing moderate to severe curves.

conclusionSpineScan3D is a handheld surface scanner with a potential of wide applications in subjects with AIS. The current study indicated that SpineScan3D is reliable and valid for measuring trunk rotation in AIS subjects, comparable to Scoliometer. Further studies are planned to investigate its measurements in coronal and sagittal planes and the potential of this device as a screening and monitoring tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (DATE OF REGISTRATION): HKUCTR-2288 (06 Dec 2017). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Indexed as

ScoliosisSpineTorsoAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsRotationThoracic VertebraeAdolescent idiopathic scoliosisScoliometerSurface scannerTrunk rotation

Identifiers

PMID37493936
PMCPMC10587198
OpenAlexW4385264553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.