SynthesisMolecular neurobiology2023
Exploring the Causality of Type 1 Diabetes and Stroke Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Molecular neurobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Inflammatory bowel disease and the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage: A Mendelian randomization study and meta-analysis.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023Pooled it
- Association Between the Hemoglobin Glycation Index and the Risk of Delirium in Stroke Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study Based on the MIMIC-IV Database.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Mendelian Randomization Analysis of the Relationship Between Immune-Related Diseases and Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Causal relationships between type 1 diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Type II diabetes was causally related to stroke, which is a risk factor for stroke. However, the causal relationship between type I diabetes(T1D) and stroke, especially its subtypes, remains unclear. To determine whether T1D has a genetic causal link to stroke and its subtypes, we undertook this mendelian randomization (MR) study. The genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of T1D was the source of exposure. The outcomes were strokes and their subtypes, including ischemic stroke (IS), small vessel stroke (SVS), cardioembolic stroke (CES), large artery atherosclerosis stroke (LAS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (LICH), and non-lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (NLICH). We used outcome GWAS conducted by ISGC consortium for the initial phase and GWAS from MEGASTROKE consortium as the data for the replication phase to confirm the causal association. Besides, we conducted a meta-analysis of the causal association from ISGC and MEGASTROKE databases to confirm robust causality. Inverse-variance weighting (IVW) was utilized as the primary method to estimate the causality between T1D and stroke. The Cochran's Q test and the MR-PRESSO global test were used to examine the sensitivity. We discovered the causal relationship between T1D and SVS (OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.28, p = 6.0 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
37493922What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.