Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37493864›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2023

Comparative study of soft tissue surgery by visible and infrared laser radiation.

Andrey D Khlopkov, Ilia D Samoilov, Ksenia V Shatilova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrey D Khlopkov"MeLSyTech" Ltd, Dzerzhinsk, Russia. anbion@yandex.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0786-9975
Ilia D Samoilov"MeLSyTech" Ltd, Dzerzhinsk, Russia.
Ksenia V Shatilova"MeLSyTech" Ltd, Dzerzhinsk, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7056-9871
Yandex (Russia) · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the cutting properties of lasers with different wavelengths (445 nm, 532 nm and 808 nm) used in cutting blood-rich tissues. Porcine myocardial tissue was cut using 2.3-15 W laser radiation in contact and non-contact modes with an optical fiber or focusing handpiece. The cut depth and coagulation zone width were determined histologically. The 445-nm laser achieved the greatest cut depth for all cutting parameters (p < 0.01). The blue laser gave the smallest coagulation width to cut depth ratio. Results of the study are consistent with the assumption that a 445 nm blue laser may have better cutting properties than green and infrared lasers due to the high absorption of radiation at this wavelength in hemoglobin and, consequently, in the biological blood-rich tissue.

Indexed as

LasersLaser TherapyAnimalsInfrared RaysSwineBlue diodeCoagulationHistologyKTPVaporization

Identifiers

PMID37493864
OpenAlexW4385264439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.