Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37493861›Full record

Trial reportGeroScience2024

Functional mobility and physical fitness are improved through a multicomponent training program in institutionalized older adults.

Sergio López-López, Vanesa Abuín-Porras, Luis A Berlanga, Michelle Martos-Duarte, Luis Perea-Unceta, Carlos Romero-Morales, Helios Pareja-Galeano

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Cluster randomized trial of reablement strategies targeting sarcopenia (ReStart-S) in long-term care settings.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sergio López-LópezFaculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Vanesa Abuín-PorrasFaculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Luis A BerlangaDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport, Centro de Estudios Universitarios Cardenal Spínola CEU, Seville, Spain.
Michelle Martos-DuarteFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Perea-UncetaFaculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Romero-MoralesFaculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. carlos.romero@universidadeuropea.es.ORCID 0000-0001-6598-829X
Helios Pareja-GaleanoDepartment of Physical Education, Sport and Human Movement, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Europea de Madrid · ESUniversidad Francisco de Vitoria · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

Universidad Europea de Madrid 2020/UEM29
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical exercise has demonstrated its effectiveness in the management of the deleterious process of aging. However, it is less studied in institutionalized elderly people. This investigation aims to clarify the benefits of a multicomponent training program in institutionalized older adults. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with institutionalized older adults (≥ 70 years old). Intervention group (IG; N = 18) were submitted to a multicomponent training program based on muscle power training and interval endurance exercise, 2 times/week for 12 weeks. Control group (CG; N = 16) continued their usual mobility exercises. Independence was estimated with the Barthel index, and physical fitness and functional mobility were evaluated by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, the 6-min Walking Test (6'WT), the 10-Meter Walking Test (10MWT), hand grip strength dynamometry, and lower limb muscle strength and power. The IG improved, compared with the CG, in TUG scores in -7.43 s (95% IC: 3.28, 11.59; p < 0.001); in 10MWT scores in -5.19 s (95% IC: 1.41, 8.97; p = 0.004) and -4.43 s (95% IC: 1.14, 7.73; p = 0.002), 6'WT scores in + 54.54 m (95% IC: 30.24, 78.84; p < 0.001); and SPPB in + 2.74 points (95% IC: 2.10, 3.37; p < 0.001). Maximum muscle power and maximum strength did not show statistically significant differences. The multicomponent training program based on muscle power and interval endurance exercise was shown to be safe, well tolerated and effective for the improvement of functional mobility and physical fitness, but not for independence in institutionalized older adults.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthPhysical FitnessAgedAgingExerciseExercise TherapyHumansAerobic exerciseElderly peopleIndependenceNursing homeStrength training

Identifiers

PMID37493861
PMCPMC10828358
OpenAlexW4385264281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.