ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2024
Go beyond the limits of genetic algorithm in daily covariate selection practice.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Covariate Model Selection Approaches for Population Pharmacokinetics: A Systematic Review of Existing Methods, From SCM to AI.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Pharmacometrics in the Age of Large Language Models: A Vision of the Future.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Precision Dosing in Presence of Multiobjective Therapies by Integrating Reinforcement Learning and PK-PD Models: Application to Givinostat Treatment of Polycythemia Vera.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
- Impact of covariate model building methods on their clinical relevance evaluation in population pharmacokinetic analyses: comparison of the full model, stepwise covariate model (SCM) and SCM+ approaches.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Covariate identification is an important step in the development of a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. Among the different available approaches, the stepwise covariate model (SCM) is the most used. However, SCM is based on a local search strategy, in which the model-building process iteratively tests the addition or elimination of a single covariate at a time given all the others. This introduces a heuristic to limit the searching space and then the computational complexity, but, at the same time, can lead to a suboptimal solution. The application of genetic algorithms (GAs) for covariate selection has been proposed as a possible solution to overcome these limitations. However, their actual use during model building is limited by the extremely high computational costs and convergence issues, both related to the number of models being tested. In this paper, we proposed a new GA for covariate selection to address these challenges. The GA was first developed on a simulated case study where the heuristics introduced to overcome the limitations affecting currently available GA approaches resulted able to limit the selection of redundant covariates, increase replicability of results and reduce convergence times. Then, we tested the proposed GA on a real-world problem related to remifentanil. It obtained good results both in terms of selected covariates and fitness optimization, outperforming the SCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.