Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37493849›Full record

ArticleDental press journal of orthodontics2023

Perceived esthetics and value of clear aligner therapy systems: A survey among dental school instructors and undergraduate students.

Christos Livas, Fatema Shabnam Pazhman, Zeynep Ilbeyli, Nikolaos Pandis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A Retrospective Study Regarding the Efficacy of NuvolaDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Esthetic comparison of two composites used for Invisalign's attachments bonding.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christos LivasDental Clinics Zwolle, Division of Orthodontics (Zwolle, The Netherlands).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9877-5645
Fatema Shabnam PazhmanUniversity of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Master Dentistry program (Amsterdam, The Netherlands).ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4531-8522
Zeynep IlbeyliUniversity of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Master Dentistry program (Amsterdam, The Netherlands).ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1487-5169
Nikolaos PandisUniversity of Bern, School of Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics (Bern, Switzerland).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0258-468X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the attractiveness, acceptability, visibility and willingness-to-pay for clear aligner therapy (CAT) systems in first-year and final-year dental students and instructors.

methodsA questionnaire designed to collect information regarding esthetic preferences and intentions related to seven CAT systems was handed out to 120 undergraduate students and instructors at the Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA). Proportional odds models and population average generalized estimating equation models were used to examine potential association between participant characteristics, esthetic perceptions and CAT systems.

resultsOverall, the examined CAT systems received favorable esthetic ratings. Expertise status was significantly associated with willingness-to-pay additionally for CAT, compared to fixed orthodontic appliances. There was no association between sex, previous orthodontic treatment history, satisfaction with own dental appearance and potential interest in treatment and aligner visibility and willingness-to-pay. CAT system was significantly associated with the perceived aligner visibility, acceptability and attractiveness by students and instructors.

conclusionsCAT systems were considered to a great extent attractive and acceptable for future treatment by dental school instructors and students. Willingness-to-pay for CAT systems was significantly associated with expertise status, with instructors appearing more reluctant to pay for CAT.

Indexed as

Orthodontic Appliances, RemovableSchools, DentalEsthetics, DentalHumansStudentsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37493849
PMCPMC10365069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.