Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37493728›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2023

The prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors of external cervical resorption: a retrospective practice-based study.

Jenny Huang, Ryan M Walsh, David E Witherspoon, Navid Khalighinejad, Esther C Tam, Poorya Jalali, Jianing He

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. [Research progress on external cervical resorption].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jenny HuangDepartment of Endodontics, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, 3302 Gaston Ave., Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Ryan M WalshDepartment of Endodontics, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, 3302 Gaston Ave., Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
David E WitherspoonNorth Texas Endodontic Associates, Plano, TX, USA.
Navid KhalighinejadNorth Dallas Endodontics, Dallas, TX, USA.
Esther C TamDepartment of Endodontics, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, 3302 Gaston Ave., Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Poorya JalaliDepartment of Endodontics, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, 3302 Gaston Ave., Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Jianing HeDepartment of Endodontics, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, 3302 Gaston Ave., Dallas, TX, 75246, USA. hejianing@tamu.edu.
Texas A&M University · USGaston College · USUrology Associates of North Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesExternal cervical root resorption (ECR) is a poorly understood and aggressive form of resorption. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors associated with the occurrence of ECR in patients seeking endodontic care from private practice settings. MATERIALS AND

methodsRecords of 343 patients with 390 teeth diagnosed with ECR were identified from 3 private endodontic practices from 2008 to 2022. The patients' demographic information, systemic conditions, and dental history were recorded. The characteristics of the cases including Heithersay classification, pulpal and periapical status, and their management were documented. The association between case severity and potential predisposing factors was examined using chi-square analysis.

resultsThe overall prevalence of ECR among patients seeking endodontic care was low (< 1%). However, there was a greater than twofold increase in the pooled prevalence from 2016 to 2021 (0.99%) compared to the data from 2010 to 2015 (0.46%). The most commonly affected teeth were anterior teeth (48.7%). Class II (30.0%) and class III (45.4%) defects were the most often identified. Patients with a history of trauma or orthodontic treatment were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with severe cervical resorption (class III or IV) (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThere has been an increase in the prevalence of ECR in patients seeking endodontic care. A history of orthodontic treatment and traumatic dental mechanical injuries may predict the severity of resorption. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The upward trend in the occurrence of ECR warrants close monitoring of the patients at high risk of developing the condition to facilitate early detection and management.

Indexed as

Root ResorptionTooth ResorptionHumansPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTooth CervixCervical root resorptionExternal resorptionPrevalenceRisk factorsTreatment

Identifiers

PMID37493728
OpenAlexW4385264116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.