ArticleActa orthopaedica2023
Intra- and inter-observer agreement in distal radius fracture dislocation measurement of casting position.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- External validation and revision of the Lafontaine criteria for unstable distal radius fractures: a retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Distal Radius Fractures in Osteoporosis: A Comparative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeMost displaced distal radius fractures (DRF) are treated nonoperatively, with reduction and immobilization in a cast. Studies assessing intra- or inter-observer agreement on radiologic measurements of casting position have not been published, which was the aim of our study. PATIENTS AND
methodsOur study is based on the Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention (OSTPRE) study. All detected DRFs during the OSTPRE follow-up were retrieved and based on sample size calculations 50 fractures were randomly selected for the study. 5 independent reviewers measured dislocation parameters and wrist position in a cast from the radiographs. A linear mixed model was used to estimate the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and total deviance index (TDI) that were used to evaluate intra- and inter-observer agreement. We used Kappa values to determine intra- and inter-rater agreement on radiographically acceptable reduction of the DRF. Limits of acceptable position were those defined by Finnish Current Care Guidelines.
resultsFor radial inclination, radial shortening, and dorsal/volar tilt, intra- and inter-observer correlations were high (CCC > 0.76). In addition, measurements of wrist angle in a splint had high correlations (CCC > 0.78), whereas measurement of intra-articular gap and step had poor correlations (CCC < 0.52). The Kappa value for overall agreement on the radiographically acceptable position of the DRF was modest (0.59).
conclusionIntra- and inter-observer repeatability of casting position of radial inclination, radial shortening, and dorsal/volar tilt were high whereas intra-articular gap and step had poor correlations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.