Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37493446›Full record

ArticleJournal of reproductive and infant psychology2025

The impact of gestational diabetes mellitus on perceived mother-infant bonding: a qualitative study.

Madeleine Benton, Jessica Bird, Susan Pawlby, Khalida Ismail

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of reproductive and infant psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Madeleine BentonDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Jessica BirdDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Susan PawlbyDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Khalida IsmailDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is rapidly increasing. It is associated with adverse physical and mental health outcomes for women and their babies. Mother-infant bonding is important for maternal health and infant development, but the effect of GDM on mother-infant bonding has not been examined.

objectiveTo explore and describe the impact of GDM on perceived mother infant-bonding in the antenatal and postnatal period.

methodsQualitative, individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 women from diverse backgrounds with current or previous GDM. Data were analysed using reflexive inductive thematic analysis.

resultsThree main themes were generated from the analysis: 1) Concern for baby's health and its impact on bonding; 2) GDM management, the pregnancy experience, and bonding; 3) Continuity and discontinuity of the impact on bonding between the antenatal and postnatal periods.

conclusionIt was found that GDM can have both positive and negative impacts on perceived mother-infant bonding, which appear to change over the course of the perinatal period. Further observational research is needed to assist in understanding the impact of GDM on mother-infant bonding and the potential mediating effect of mental disorders, including depression.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalMother-Child RelationsMothersObject AttachmentAdultFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicPregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung AdultGestational diabetes mellitusmother-infant bondingperinatal mental healthpostnatalpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37493446
PMCPMC11854049
OpenAlexW4385264847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.