Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37493159›Full record

ReviewCurrent pediatric reviews2024

Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcal Pharyngitis: An Updated Review.

Alexander K C Leung, Joseph M Lam, Benjamin Barankin, Kin F Leong, Kam L Hon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pediatric reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Clinical diagnosis of group AZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexander K C LeungDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Calgary, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2254-6971
Joseph M LamDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Dermatology and Skin Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7808-3369
Benjamin BarankinDepartment of Dermatology, Toronto Dermatology Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9010-8968
Kin F LeongPediatric Institute, Kuala Lumpur General Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-1984-7960
Kam L HonDepartment of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6682-5529
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKHospital Kuala Lumpur · MYUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGroup A ß-hemolytic

objectiveThis article aims to familiarize clinicians with the clinical manifestations, evaluation, diagnosis, and management of GABHS pharyngitis.

methodsA search was conducted in December 2022 in PubMed Clinical Queries using the key term "group A β-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis". This review covers mainly literature published in the previous ten years.

resultsChildren with GABHS pharyngitis typically present with an abrupt onset of fever, intense pain in the throat, pain on swallowing, an inflamed pharynx, enlarged and erythematous tonsils, a red and swollen uvula, enlarged tender anterior cervical lymph nodes. As clinical manifestations may not be specific, even experienced clinicians may have difficulties diagnosing GABHS pharyngitis solely based on epidemiologic or clinical grounds alone. Patients suspected of having GABHS pharyngitis should be confirmed by microbiologic testing (e.g., culture, rapid antigen detection test, molecular point-of-care test) of a throat swab specimen prior to the initiation of antimicrobial therapy. Microbiologic testing is generally unnecessary in patients with pharyngitis whose clinical and epidemiologic findings do not suggest GABHS. Clinical score systems such as the Centor score and McIssac score have been developed to help clinicians decide which patients should undergo diagnostic testing and reduce the unnecessary use of antimicrobials. Antimicrobial therapy should be initiated without delay once the diagnosis is confirmed. Oral penicillin V and amoxicillin remain the drugs of choice. For patients who have a non-anaphylactic allergy to penicillin, oral cephalosporin is an acceptable alternative. For patients with a history of immediate, anaphylactic-type hypersensitivity to penicillin, oral clindamycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin are acceptable alternatives.

conclusionEarly diagnosis and antimicrobial treatment are recommended to prevent suppurative complications (e.g., cervical lymphadenitis, peritonsillar abscess) and non-suppurative complications (particularly rheumatic fever) as well as to reduce the severity of symptoms, to shorten the duration of the illness and to reduce disease transmission.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPharyngitisStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus pyogenesAdolescentChildHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsCentor scoregroup A ß-hemolytic StreptococcusMcIssac scorepharyngitisstrawberry tongueStreptococcus pyogenes.

Identifiers

PMID37493159
OpenAlexW4385264500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.