Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37492934›Full record

Trial reportPediatrics2023

A Social Care System Implemented in Pediatric Primary Care: A Cluster RCT.

Arvin Garg, Annelise Brochier, Yorghos Tripodis, Emily Messmer, Mari-Lynn Drainoni

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How High-Performing Community Health Clinics Accomplish Social Risk Screening.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Arvin GargChild Health Equity Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School and University of Massachusetts Memorial Children's Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Annelise BrochierDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Yorghos TripodisDepartments of Biostatistics.
Emily MessmerQuality and Patient Experience, Mass General Brigham, Somerville, Massachusetts.
Mari-Lynn DrainoniHealth Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Boston Medical Center · USBoston University · USCancer Research And Biostatistics · USChildren's Medical Center · USMass General Brigham · US

Funding

Reducing Socioeconomic Disparities in Health at Pediatric VisitsR01MD007793 · NIMHD · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI GARG, ARVIN · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD007793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the implementation and effectiveness of the augmented WE CARE social care system on low-income children's health care utilization and child maltreatment outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized controlled trial at 6 community health centers. Full-term infants were followed from birth to age 3. The 3 experimental clinics implemented the augmented WE CARE system at well-child visits, consisting of a self-report screening instrument for 7 basic needs; an electronic health record-generated resource information referral system; and access to a peer patient navigator. Families at control community health centers received usual care; 1 control site was contaminated and removed from primary analysis. We analyzed results using generalized mixed-effects models.

resultsOverall, 878 children were followed until age 3. Implementation of WE CARE was poor with only 28.9% of visits having a WE CARE screener documented. WE CARE families received significantly more resource referrals than control families (43.1% vs 1.9%, adjusted odds ratio 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-5.6); 20% were referred to the patient navigator. WE CARE children had significantly higher immunization adherence ratios. Although there were no statistically significant differences with well-child visits, WE CARE children had higher rates of emergency department visits than control children. By age 3, WE CARE children had significantly higher hospitalization rates (14.1% vs 10.4%, adjusted odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.7). There were no statistically significant differences with maltreatment outcomes.

conclusionsWe found poor implementation and mixed benefits for the augmented WE CARE system on immunization, health care utilization, and maltreatment outcomes in early childhood.

Indexed as

Child AbusePatient Acceptance of Health CareChildChild HealthChild, PreschoolHumansInfantPrimary Health CareSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID37492934
PMCPMC10389771
OpenAlexW4385264221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.