ArticleCureus2023
Reconstruction of Bilateral Upper and Lower Eyelid Ectropion Caused by a Liquid Unblocker Chemical Burn.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for Functional and Cosmetic Outcomes Post Burn for Eyelid Ectropion-A Scoping Review.European burn journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid drain unblockers, although meant to be used by professionals with protective equipment, are sometimes used in the household without any precautions. This could lead to severe chemical burns, as in the case we present with severe eyelid ectropion. This study aims to stress the need for preventive measures regarding the use of chemicals and for close observation and timely surgical intervention in chemical burn patients to prevent and limit disfigurement. A 45-year-old woman was injured while using an unblocker (90% sulfuric acid) at home. Accidentally, a quantity of the liquid was spilled on her face. She was initially examined in ophthalmology emergencies because of the obvious ocular involvement, and the cutaneous component was underestimated. On the third post-burn day, she was referred as an outpatient to our clinic, and because of the soft consistency and patchy pattern of the burn, she was asked to revisit in a week. Unfortunately, she reappeared two months post-burn with severe ectropion of all four eyelids and a high risk of corneal abrasion, desiccation, and further damage to the already injured left eye as well as the right eye. She underwent three operations in six months and a fourth 15 months after the accident, with the release of the scarred eyelids with full-thickness skin grafts, Z-plasties, and V-Y plasties. After four operations and sessions of triamcinolone acetonide intralesional injection, the patient has a satisfactory eyelid position and function with adequate closure and scar maturation. Domestic use of strong industrial chemicals is dangerous, and public education for prevention is urgently needed. On the other hand, it is mandatory to follow up very closely with chemical burn patients to prevent severe sequelae, especially in the delicate and contraction-prone periocular and perioral areas. Reconstruction, in these cases, is a complex task. Often, several surgeries are needed to restore acceptable function and appearance. Burn disfigurement and self-stigma will follow the patients to some extent throughout their lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.