ArticleCureus2023
Atracurium Versus Cis-Atracurium for Laryngeal Relaxation and Hemodynamic Stability in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Use of Cisatracurium in Cardiac Surgery.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2025Article
- Age-Specific Pharmacology of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents: A Comprehensive Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim Equipotent dose of atracurium and cis-atracurium has failed to show clinically equi-effective muscle relaxation actions required for laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation (LETI) in adults. There needs to be more data on children. We aimed to compare the efficacy of equipotent atracurium and cis-atracurium for producing optimal LETI. We also compared the hemodynamic stability and side effects. Methods With approvals and informed consent, 104 children between three and 12 years were enrolled in the present randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm study. Fifty-two participants were recruited in each group and received either 2ED95 atracurium (0.5mg/kg) or 2ED95 cis-atracurium (0.1mg/kg). Three-point scale, i.e., excellent, good, and poor, were assigned based on jaw relaxation, vocal cords, diaphragmatic movement, coughing, and resistance to the laryngoscope blade. Basic hemodynamics and adverse events like flushing, hemodynamic instability, and airway spasms were noted. The groups were compared using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U or Chi-square tests as applicable; a p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results Entire enrolled participants completed the study. Excellent LETI conditions were significantly higher in the atracurium than in cis-atracurium (53.8% versus 19.2%, p-value <0.001). In the present study, blunted laryngoscopy-related sympathetic surge containing the increase in hemodynamic parameters within 20% from the baseline was noted in both groups, but the blunting and fall back of hemodynamic towards the baseline was rapid in the atracurium (within 7 minutes of LETI) group than cis-atracurium, i.e., 72 minutes; p-value <0.001. Only one flushing was noted in the atracurium group compared to none in the cis-atracurium. Conclusion 2ED95 dose of cis-atracurium (0.1mg/kg), although have minor advantages of maintaining hemodynamic better, has lower adverse events, it provides significantly lower 'Excellent LETI conditions' when compared to 2ED95 dose of atracurium (0.5mg/kg) in children of age three to 12 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.