ArticleCureus2023
Association of Various Spinopelvic Parameters and the Quality of Life in Those With Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis in the Indian Population.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The Difference in Paraspinal Muscle Parameters and the Correlation with Health-Related Quality of Life among Healthy Individuals, Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose The current study aimed to find any association between various spinopelvic parameters and the quality of life in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) measured as per the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) in the Indian population. Methods We included 20 DLS patients of more than 40 years with a Cobb angle of more than 10° and without any trauma, tumour, infection, or congenital scoliosis presented in our tertiary care centre in the study. The VAS and ODI were calculated for each patient. Radiological parameters were recorded for every patient, including sagittal balance, coronal balance, Cobb angle, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and lumbar lordotic angle. We evaluated the results and sought any association between clinical and radiological variables for DLS. Results Patients with positive sagittal balance had significantly higher disability than those with neutral sagittal balance (p-value 0.007). Furthermore, patients with coronal imbalance had more severe pain (p-value 0.013) and disability (p-value 0.038) than those with neutral coronal balance. We also found that the ODI and VAS were not associated with any other spinopelvic parameters. Conclusion From the present study, we can conclude that in the Indian population, both positive sagittal and coronal imbalances are associated with poor functional status in patients with DLS. Therefore, while planning surgical correction for these patients, both coronal and sagittal balance are important and need to be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.