ArticleCureus2023
Comparison Between Clinical and Pathological Staging After Elective Neck Dissection in Head and Neck Cancer.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHead and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are the most common malignancies in the head and neck. Previous studies have shown discrepancies in clinical and pathological staging, with a significant number of head and neck cancer patients who were not correctly staged. This has important implications regarding the treatment and prognosis of these patients. The aim of this study was to analyze potential disagreements in clinical and pathological staging in patients with head and neck cancer who underwent elective neck dissection.
methodsA retrospective study of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, who underwent elective neck dissection, between January 2018 and December 2020.
resultsWe analyzed 87 patients, with an average age of 64 ± 10.05 years, of whom 96.6% were male. The primary tumor location was the glottis (31%), oropharynx (26.4%), hypopharynx (19.5%), supraglottis (11.5%), and oral cavity (11.5%). In 87.3% there was a history of smoking and/or drinking. Pathological N (pN) staging was higher than clinical staging in 34.3% of patients (N1 in 22.9%; N2 in 8%; N3 in 3.4%). There were no significant differences between the number of nodes removed and the pN staging. However, there was a significant survival difference in patients with>15 nodes removed (p=0.05). There was also a significant difference in patients with pN up-staging regarding survival (p=0.005). Pathological T staging was different from clinical T staging (p<0.05), with an up-staging in 18.4% of the patients and a down-staging in 14.9%, without significant differences regarding survival or recurrence (p>0.05). Adjuvant treatment with radiotherapy was performed in 41.4% and with chemo-radiotherapy in 13.8% of the patients. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 17.5%.
conclusionThis study revealed that clinical and pathological N staging after elective neck dissection disagreed in a substantial number of patients, with pathological upstaging and significant differences regarding survival. With relation to T staging, there were no significant differences regarding survival. We should be aware of staging disagreements since they can have significant implications on the treatment and prognosis of cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.