ArticleAME case reports2023
Accidental insertion of double-J in the inferior vena cava in a patient with retroperitoneal fibrosis: a case report.
Article in AME case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Double-J Ureteral Stenting in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Pivotal or Problematic?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implantation of the double-J stent is a common procedure in urology. The function of this device is to maintain the flow of urine from the ureteropelvic junction to the urinary bladder when the ureter is blocked or partially blocked for some reason. Once in place, the stent may cause low back pain, hematuria, symptoms of urinary irritation, a reduction in labor capacity, infection and calcification which are side effects that are easy to manage. However, severe complications can occur, such as the insertion of the stent into the circulatory system, such as the vena cava, which, although uncommon, is one of the most severe and difficult to manage. This work reports the case of a patient with the accidental insertion of a double-J stent into the inferior vena cava. Case Description: An 80-year-old female patient with repeated urinary tract infections using a double-J stent due to stenosis of the right distal ureter distal presenting retroperitoneal fibrosis secondary to previous radiotherapy. The patient had Lynch syndrome, ovarian and uterine cancer, colorectal cancer, and nephrolithiasis. She had been submitted to multiple previous surgeries. Due to the possibility of viral infection by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), chest computed tomography was performed, which suggested the insertion of the double-J stent in the inferior vena cava, confirmed by abdominal computed tomography. As the distal end of the stent was within the bladder, the decision was made to remove the stent by cystoscopy, with the implantation of a new stent using fluoroscopic control for the confirmation of its trajectory. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred and the patient is currently in outpatient follow-up. Conclusions: Situations such as this require caution during the implantation of the drainage device, with the occurrence of resistance indicating the need to discontinue the procedure and perform a new assessment with imaging exams. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred and the patient is currently in outpatient follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.