Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37492792›Full record

ArticleAME case reports2023

Accidental insertion of double-J in the inferior vena cava in a patient with retroperitoneal fibrosis: a case report.

João Henrique Godoy Rodrigues, Murillo de Souza Tuckumantel, Luís Cesar Fava Spessoto, Fernando Nestor Facio

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in AME case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

João Henrique Godoy RodriguesDepartment of Urology, São José do Rio Preto School of Medicine (FAMERP/FUNFARME), São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Murillo de Souza TuckumantelSão José do Rio Preto School of Medicine (FAMERP/FUNFARME), São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luís Cesar Fava SpessotoSão José do Rio Preto School of Medicine (FAMERP/FUNFARME), São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando Nestor FacioSão José do Rio Preto School of Medicine (FAMERP/FUNFARME), São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Implantation of the double-J stent is a common procedure in urology. The function of this device is to maintain the flow of urine from the ureteropelvic junction to the urinary bladder when the ureter is blocked or partially blocked for some reason. Once in place, the stent may cause low back pain, hematuria, symptoms of urinary irritation, a reduction in labor capacity, infection and calcification which are side effects that are easy to manage. However, severe complications can occur, such as the insertion of the stent into the circulatory system, such as the vena cava, which, although uncommon, is one of the most severe and difficult to manage. This work reports the case of a patient with the accidental insertion of a double-J stent into the inferior vena cava. Case Description: An 80-year-old female patient with repeated urinary tract infections using a double-J stent due to stenosis of the right distal ureter distal presenting retroperitoneal fibrosis secondary to previous radiotherapy. The patient had Lynch syndrome, ovarian and uterine cancer, colorectal cancer, and nephrolithiasis. She had been submitted to multiple previous surgeries. Due to the possibility of viral infection by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), chest computed tomography was performed, which suggested the insertion of the double-J stent in the inferior vena cava, confirmed by abdominal computed tomography. As the distal end of the stent was within the bladder, the decision was made to remove the stent by cystoscopy, with the implantation of a new stent using fluoroscopic control for the confirmation of its trajectory. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred and the patient is currently in outpatient follow-up. Conclusions: Situations such as this require caution during the implantation of the drainage device, with the occurrence of resistance indicating the need to discontinue the procedure and perform a new assessment with imaging exams. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred and the patient is currently in outpatient follow-up.

Indexed as

case reportDouble-J stentinferior cava venaretroperitoneal fibrosisurology

Identifiers

PMID37492792
PMCPMC10364004
OpenAlexW4384563487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.