ArticleFrontiers in radiology2022
Feasibility analysis of CT-guided thermal ablation of multiple pulmonary nodules combined with intraoperative biopsy.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating Surgery and Ablative Therapies for the Management of Multiple Primary Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Retrospective cohort study on the correlation analysis among peri-procedural factors, complications, and local tumor progression of lung tumors treated with CT-guided microwave ablation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the safety and feasibility of computed tomography (CT)-guided thermal ablation of multiple pulmonary nodules combined with intraoperative biopsy. Methods: The data of 431 patients with 540 lung nodules undergoing CT-guided biopsy or ablation were retrospectively analyzed. Biopsy-only group (A): 107 patients (107 lesions) received CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy only; Ablation-only group (B): 117 cases (117 lesions) only received CT-guided thermal ablation; Single focal ablation combined with biopsy group (C): 103 patients (103 lesions) received CT-guided thermal ablation combined with intraoperative immediate biopsy; Multifocal ablation combined with biopsy group (D): 104 patients (213 lesions) received CT-guided thermal ablation combined with intraoperative biopsy. The success rate of this technique was calculated, the complications were recorded, and the positive rate of pathological diagnosis of the specimens was evaluated (the tissue specimens could be confirmed as positive by pathological diagnosis). Results: All 431 patients with pulmonary nodules successfully completed the operation, and the technical success rate was 100% (431/431). In group A, hemoptysis occurred in seven cases after operation, while no hemoptysis was observed in the other groups. Pneumothorax occurred in 8 cases in group A, 14 cases in group B, 11 cases in group C, and 13 cases in group D. Hydrothorax occurred in 4 cases in group A, 7 cases in group B, 5 cases in group C and 9 cases in group D, and there were no significant differences between the groups. The positive rate of pathological diagnosis was 84.1% (90/107) in group A, 81.5% (84/103) in group C, and 82.6% (176/213) in group D, and there was no significant difference among the groups ( Conclusion: CT-guided thermal ablation of multiple pulmonary nodules combined with intraoperative biopsy does not prolong the length of hospital stay or increase the risk of postoperative complications. It can meet the requirements of clinical, pathological and genetic testing, and is safe and reliable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.