ArticleFrontiers in radiology2022
Normal Appearing Ischaemic Brain Tissue on CT and Outcome After Intravenous Alteplase.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Aims: The visibility of ischaemic brain lesions on non-enhanced CT increases with time. Obviously hypoattenuating lesions likely represent infarction. Conversely, viable ischaemic brain lesions may be non-visible on CT. We tested whether patients with normal appearing ischaemic brain tissue (NAIBT) on their initial CT are identifiable, and if NAIBT yields better outcomes with alteplase. Methods: With data from the Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3, a large randomized-controlled trial of intravenous alteplase for ischaemic stroke) we used receiver-operating characteristic analysis to find a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) threshold for identifying patients who developed medium-large ischaemic lesions within 48 h. From patients with baseline CT (acquired <6 h from stroke onset), we used this NIHSS threshold for selection and tested whether favorable outcome after alteplase (6-month Oxford Handicap Score 0-2) differed between patients with NAIBT vs. with those with visible lesions on baseline CT using binary logistic regression (controlled for age, NIHSS, time from stroke onset to CT). Results: From 2,961 patients (median age 81 years, median 2.6 h from stroke onset, 1,534 [51.8%] female, 1,484 [50.1%] allocated alteplase), NIHSS>11 best identified those with medium-large ischaemic lesions (area under curve = 0.79, sensitivity = 72.3%, specificity = 71.9%). In IST-3, 1,404/2,961 (47.4%) patients had baseline CT and NIHSS>11. Of these, 745/1,404 (53.1%) had visible baseline ischaemic lesions, 659/1,404 (46.9%) did not (NAIBT). Adjusted odds ratio for favorable outcome after alteplase was 1.54 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.36), p = 0.045 among patients with NAIBT vs. 1.61 (0.97-2.67), Conclusions: Patients with ischaemic stroke and NIHSS >11 commonly develop sizeable ischaemic brain lesions by 48 h that may not be visible within 6 h of stroke onset. Invisible ischaemic lesions may indicate tissue viability. In IST-3, patients with this clinical-radiological mismatch allocated to alteplase achieved more favorable outcome than those allocated to control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.