Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37492378›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in radiology2023

Mouse brain MR super-resolution using a deep learning network trained with optical imaging data.

Zifei Liang, Jiangyang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zifei LiangDepartment of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
Jiangyang ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging, New York University, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

Imaging Neonatal Hypoxic Ischemic InjuryR01HD074593 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FRANCES J NORTHINGTON, JIANGYANG ZHANG · 2013 to 2026
$6.8M
Quantitative Imaging of Mouse Brain DevelopmentR01NS102904 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ZHANG, JIANGYANG · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074593NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The resolution of magnetic resonance imaging is often limited at the millimeter level due to its inherent signal-to-noise disadvantage compared to other imaging modalities. Super-resolution (SR) of MRI data aims to enhance its resolution and diagnostic value. While deep learning-based SR has shown potential, its applications in MRI remain limited, especially for preclinical MRI, where large high-resolution MRI datasets for training are often lacking. Methods: In this study, we first used high-resolution mouse brain auto-fluorescence (AF) data acquired using serial two-photon tomography (STPT) to examine the performance of deep learning-based SR for mouse brain images. Results: We found that the best SR performance was obtained when the resolutions of training and target data were matched. We then applied the network trained using AF data to MRI data of the mouse brain, and found that the performance of the SR network depended on the tissue contrast presented in the MRI data. Using transfer learning and a limited set of high-resolution mouse brain MRI data, we were able to fine-tune the initial network trained using AF to enhance the resolution of MRI data. Discussion: Our results suggest that deep learning SR networks trained using high-resolution data of a different modality can be applied to MRI data after transfer learning.

Indexed as

deep learningMRImulti-modality imagesuper-resolution (SR)transfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37492378
PMCPMC10365285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.