ArticleActa clinica Croatica2022
ESTIMATION OF THE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE IN CHILDREN WITH HEMOPHILIA.
Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is one of the best-performing methods in evaluating kidney function. There are limited data regarding the estimated glomerular filtration rate in children and young adults with hemophilia. The aim of this study was to determine the difference between three commonly used estimated glomerular filtration rate equations in the pediatric population in a cohort of patients with hemophilia. Our prospective study included 36 pediatric patients with moderate or severe hemophilia. eGFR was calculated for each patient using the original creatinine-based "bedside Schwartz" equation, the cystatin C-based equation and the creatinine-cystatin C-based equation. The difference between the equations, calculated using the one-way repeated ANOVA test, was statistically significant (p <0.001), and post hoc analysis found differences between each method. Correlation analysis showed the strongest positive correlation between the bedside Schwartz equation and creatinine-cystatin C-based equation (r=0.866) among the three methods examined. A correlation between the three eGFR methods was present, but with significant differences between them. Due to the observed differences between eGFR in pediatric patients with hemophilia, further research is needed to find the optimal measurement method for eGFR. Nevertheless, we recommend implementing eGFR equations in routine clinical monitoring of pediatric patients with hemophilia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.