Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37492345›Full record

ArticleBreathe (Sheffield, England)2023

The exposome concept: how has it changed our understanding of environmental causes of chronic respiratory diseases?

Alicia Guillien, Manosij Ghosh, Thomas Gille, Orianne Dumas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of asthma: from bench to bedside.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Global research trends on the human exposome: a bibliometric analysis (2005-2024).Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Review
  9. Asthma Inception: Epidemiologic Risk Factors and Natural History Across the Life Course.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alicia GuillienUniversity of Grenoble Alpes, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research, French National Center for Scientific Research, Team of Environmental Epidemiology Applied to Reproduction and Respiratory Health, Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Grenoble, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0586-3449
Manosij GhoshEnvironment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas GilleInserm UMR 1272 "Hypoxia & the Lung", UFR Santé, Médecine, Biologie Humaine (SMBH) Léonard de Vinci, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (USPN), Bobigny, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1577-6595
Orianne DumasUniversité Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Univ. Paris-Sud, Inserm, Equipe d'Epidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, CESP, Villejuif, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8423-2826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID37492345
PMCPMC10365075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.