ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
Comparative study on the accuracy, safety and clinical effect of CT navigation and traditional open screw placement in the Treatment of Thoracic Fracture.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the accuracy, safety and clinical effect of descending thoracic pedicle screw fixation assisted by computer CT three-dimensional navigation in the treatment of single segmental compression thoracic fracture. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis. From June 2020 to June 2022, eighty patients with thoracic vertebral fractures admitted to Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University were were divided into observation group and control group according to different methods of screw placement, with 40 cases in each group. The navigation system was used to insert pedicle screws, and the control group used traditional open X-ray to insert pedicle screws by hand. Further comparison was carried out in terms of the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, perioperative complications, accuracy and safety rate of screw placement, and vertebral compression ratio between both the groups. Results: The average intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was significantly less than the control group, the average screw insertion time was significantly shorter than the control group, the postoperative average vertebral body compression ratios was significantly better than the control group, the excellent rate of screw insertion was better than the control group, while the incidence of complications was lower than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05). Conclusion: Intraoperative CT navigation for pedicle screw placement can reduce the time of screw placement and intraoperative blood loss, improve the excellent rate of screw placement and the compression ratio of the anterior edge of the injured vertebra, the complication rate was low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.